{"id":60,"date":"2020-03-18T10:29:33","date_gmt":"2020-03-18T10:29:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/boughrood.wales\/?page_id=60"},"modified":"2021-05-13T16:16:23","modified_gmt":"2021-05-13T16:16:23","slug":"railway","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/boughrood.wales\/?page_id=60","title":{"rendered":"Railway and Railway Disasters"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\n

The Mid-Wales Railway came to Boughrood in 1864. Only 70 miles of track were laid and the company struggled to make a profit. It amalgamated with the Cambrian Railways in 1904 and finally closed on 30th December 1962.<\/p>\r\n\"\"<\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\n
\"\"

The train leaving the station<\/p><\/div>\r\n

\"\"

Boughrood & Llyswen Station<\/p><\/div>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

\r\n
\"\"

The Railway Bridge over the Wye<\/p><\/div>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n

\"\"

Bridge with train<\/p><\/div>\r\n

\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

\"\"

The layout of Boughrood Station<\/p><\/div>\r\n

Railway Disasters<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

The railway was not without its tragedies. One of the first in November 1866 was the tragic death of 72-year-old Mary Powell who lived at Boughrood Court. Having spent the day shopping with one of her grandchildren Mrs Powell was walking the short distance home. As Mrs Powell stepped over the line at the crossing an engine which had just been shunted to take on water suddenly came along and struck her before she could get out of the way. The newspaper report of the day told readers that the train ran her over mutilating her body in such a manner that death must have been instantaneous. The child escaped unhurt. The newspaper report concluded, \u201cThe deceased was an elderly person, and much respected, so that the event has cast quite a gloom over the neighbourhood.\u201d<\/p>\r\n

Railway Bridge Disaster<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

Disaster struck again when the railway bridge was being dismantled following the closure of the line after the Beeching cuts of the early 1960s.\u00a0 The bridge collapsed into the river, killing one man and narrowly avoiding further deaths.\u00a0 The newspaper article and report of the inquest tell the story:<\/p>\r\n

Newspaper Article from Thursday 9th July 1964

\"\"

<\/p>\r\n

\"\"<\/p>\r\n

\"\"<\/p>\r\n

\"\"<\/p>\r\n

\"\"<\/p>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n

\"\"<\/p>\r\n

\r\n

\"\"<\/p>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n

<\/p>\r\n

Transcription of article in the TIMES-GAZETTE, <\/strong>July 1964.<\/em><\/p>\r\n

MANSLAUGHTER VERDICT AT INQUEST<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

Man who died when bridge collapsed<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

After a ten hour hearing at a Llandrindod Wells inquest conducted by the Radnorshire Coroner on Monday, the jury returned a verdict of manslaughter against the Northern Strip Mining Company of Sheffield, and the case will be heard at the next Radnorshire Assizes.<\/p>\r\n

The inquest was on Glanville Charles Evans of Pentre, Rhondda, who was drowned on July 5th in the River Wye when the disused railway bridge at Boughrood was being demolished for the company.<\/p>\r\n

Together with other men working on the bridge, he was thrown into the river when the 325 ton steel bridge collapsed and plunged into the river.\u00a0 While the rest of the workmen escaped by swimming, Evans disappeared and his body was recovered from the river by frogmen next day.<\/p>\r\n

Both sides<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

Douglas Newby Robinson, the foreman in charge of the demolition gang, told the Coroner, Mr H.F. Ludford, that he had had no previous experience of demolishing a single span bridge of the type concerned.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cInstructions were given to me by the managing director but they were not in writing. I did not have a plan on paper\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

Robinson said the bridge was not marked in any way.\u00a0 He said instructions were to start work on the upstream side of the bridge but while he was away from the bridge the gang started on both sides.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cDidn\u2019t you think there was any danger?\u201d asked the Coroner.\u00a0 \u201cNo, I didn\u2019t\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cYou only knew that anything was being wrongly done when it turned out badly?\u201d \u2013 \u201cYes\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

Robinson said he had been told to report daily by telephoning but when doing so the day before the accident, he did not mention the variation of method.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

When the bridge collapsed, the gang were attempting to remove a section of metal which had been burned out.\u00a0 The metal was \u2018pinching\u2019, and when the Coroner asked: \u201cDid that mean nothing to you?\u201d Robinson answered: \u201cNo\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

He gave instructions to cut out a Vee to release the section.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cYour procedure was to put men on top of the bridge and see what effect the work had\u201d said the Coroner.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cYou are supposed to know the effect before cutting. You really had no idea what would happen\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

Robinson told Mr R.J. Hughes, H.M. District Inspector of Factories that he was first employed by N.S.M. Company in August last year. His first experience of demolition was at the beginning of June this year.<\/p>\r\n

Aware of danger<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

Mr Harrry Camm, managing director of N.S.M., said he was a chartered engineer.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cI am aware of the extreme danger inherent in demolition work\u201d, he said. He knew that precautions were required to be taken to avoid collapse.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cThere would have been no collapse if my instructions had been followed\u201d, he declared.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cI can accept no responsibility for it\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

Mr Camm said he had every confidence in Robinson up to the time of the accident.<\/p>\r\n

But the Coroner said: \u201cYou relied on a man to carry out instructions who didn\u2019t understand them. It was your responsibility to see that he knew what he was doing. Supervision was to be by telephone. There was nobody on the spot\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

Camm: \u201cIt was my duty to supervise the demolition, and I did. Robinson contravened my instructions\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

Answering Mr Michael Evans, who appeared for the relatives of the deceased, Mr Camm said: \u201cI gave verbal instructions\u201d.<\/p>\r\n

He was satisfied that his method of demolition was safe, but agreed if the procedure was varied, danger would arise. He told Robinson that. A dumper was used in the attempt to pull out the bridge section.<\/p>\r\n

Mr Camm said he had warned the foreman about the accumulation of weight on the bridge.<\/p>\r\n

Summing up, the Coroner said: \u201cThey tampered with the bridge because Robinson had no idea what he was doing. Mr Camm should not have left him with no proper experience and no skill on this dangerous operation.<\/p>\r\n

\u201cThere was nobody there to observe the pinching and clear everyone off the bridge. That should have been done and would have been done if the company through its employees had had the foresight to have an experienced man to supervise.<\/p>\r\n

Earlier a Newtown man, Mr John Williams, who was employed on the bridge as a welder and acetylene cutter, said their orders were given by their foreman to cut the cross members of the bridge. Normally the men wore safety belts attached to the safety wire, when working on the top of the bridge. That morning, although the belts were on the bridge, they were not used.<\/p>\r\n

Mr John Arthur Weale, of Windsor Cottage, Newbridge-on-Wye, who worked for N.S.M. said he took a dumper to the bridge on July 5. On arrival he watched the men cutting one of the metal sides of the bridge. While there, Mr Williams asked him to fetch something that was not on the bridge.<\/p>\r\n

On returning, he had only taken about twenty paces across the bridge when it collapsed. He told the Coroner: \u201cIt all happened in a flash\u201d. Mr Weale who was thrown on his back and had to crawl to safety, did not see what happened to the other men.<\/p>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n